Body language and non-verbal communication






This cartoon strip is the briefest summing up I've come across of the absurdity of the overstated claims about the supposedly overwhelming importance of body language and non-verbal communication that circulate so widely in the worlds of presentation skills and management training.

So I was pleased to see that the debate has resurfaced again HERE, as it's something I've been banging on about it for years (see, for example, 'Physical Facts and Fiction', Chapter 11, Lend Me Your Ears) and Step 7 in Speech-making and Presentation Made Easy.

One of the most widely repeated myths asserts that the relative importance of different factors in communication is even more extreme than the 80% referred to in the above cartoon, namely:

Words: 7%
Body language: 38%
Tone of voice: 55%.

But the idea that 93% of communication is non-verbal flies in the face of our common sense experience, and I've never heard any of its advocates address any of the following rather obvious questions:

1. How come it's much easier to have a conversation with a blind person than with someone who's completely deaf?
2. How come we can have perfectly good conversations in the dark?
3. How come telephones and radio have been such spectacular successes?
4. How come we have to work so hard to learn foreign languages?

To these, I would add what I consider to be quite an important lesson from my experience of doing research into political speech-making, which was originally based solely on audio tape recordings. Once video tapes became available, however, none of the audio-based findings had to be rejected or seriously revised, though the added visual dimension did help to extend our understanding and, in some cases, to explain apparently 'deviant' cases.

The same applies more generally to research in the field of conversation analysis, where I know of no examples where audio-based findings had to be rejected, or even significantly modified, in the face of video recorded data.

In other words, most of the core observations were originally derived from audio evidence alone, and were robust enough to survive the more detailed scrutiny that becomes possible with access to video-recordings.

That's why I'm so convinced that what is said is far more important than the 7% brigade make out. Otherwise, the forum speech in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar would presumably have started with the words 'Lend me your EYES' - and I wouldn't have been so stupid as to publish a book entitled Lend Me Your Ears.

78 comments:

  1. A couple of random thoughts:

    1. How come it's much easier to have a conversation with a blind person than with someone who's completely deaf?

    Because your non-verbal communication is not interfering with your verbal communication. Saying that x% of communication is non-verbal does not imply that verbal & non-verbal communication are saying the same (from the emitters perspective) nor that they are understood as saying the same (receptor). One could argue for less interference.

    2. How come we can have perfectly good conversations in the dark?

    Again saying that x% of the communication is non-verbal does not imply that a) there is communication without a non-verbal part; b) that communication with a non-verbal part is better than a communication without; c) that all communication have non-verbal parts. It simply says that WHEN there is a non-verbal part, this part represents x%.

    3. How come telephones and radio have been such spectacular successes?
    I don't see how this is in contradiction with a statement saying that x% of communication is non-verbal (in a situation when there is a non-verbal part).

    4. How come we have to work so hard to learn foreign languages?
    As with any skill, it is hard to learn. I know people talking more than 7 or 8 languages: for them learning a new language is "easy".

    However, I agree to question the x%: how much is x? And in which circumstances?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I’m not sure I quite understand what points you're making here, Laurent. Maybe I didn’t use enough words even to get 7% of my points across and should perhaps have left it to the cartoon strip to do the job for me so much more economically.

    So here are a few more words on each of the four questions I referred to:

    1 & 2: My point about the relative ease of conversing with a blind person or with a sighted person in the dark is simply that, in my experience, such conversations seem to proceed pretty smoothly even when one or both of you can’t see anything at all (in marked contrast to conversations when one or other of you can't hear anything).

    3: The same is true of speech we hear on radio and telephones, and it’s doubtful whether either gadget would ever have become so popular if only 62% the talk was getting through to us ((i.e. 7% words +55% tone of voice).

    4. If 93% comes from body language and tone of voice, native speakers of one particular language would already be able to understand 93% of anything said in any other language without having to go to all the trouble of trying to learn about the missing 7%.

    More generally, after about 40 years of doing research of one kind or another, I've never been able to figure out (and nor has anyone been able to enlighten me about) a rigorous research design that would be able to measure the 'variables' words+body language+tone of voice with such precision as to have any confidence in the kinds of percentages that Mehrabian and his fans have bequeathed to a gullible world.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Will Thalheimer of Will at Work Learning has tried time and again to drive a stake through the heart of this myth.

    Here's a January 2009 post in which he recaps more than six years of trying to ferret out research.

    ReplyDelete
  4. In the original study, the issue was about ambiguous words. The percentages related to discerning the correct meaning of the words from associated resources.

    Make your sentences clear and easy to understand and this issue does not arise.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Those statistics are 'seminar candy'- easy to regurgitate, easy to swallow :-)

    Thinking back to a few different events where I've heard these statistics cited, I'm struck by the fact that I can't actually remember the point that any of those people were trying to make. Interesting.

    Body language and intonation certainly do enrich the meaning of the words we speak.

    Sometimes, when we communicate without body language and intonation (like online chat or text) misunderstanding can easily occur.

    Other times, communication without body language and intonation works perfectly well. Ask any airline pilot.

    Body language and non-verbal communication can affirm, confuse, changes and contradict the words we speak.

    For some, like airline pilots, it's a kind of confusing 'noise' that could lead to fatal misunderstandings.

    For others, body language and intonation is a pleasure, a vocabulary and a resource.

    For others, it's a window to a truth they'd prefer hidden.

    What interests me is how, when, where and why people embrace or avoid non-verbal communication and the part technology plays in that.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It is glad to see this blog, it is good and detailed fun to read this, nice informative blog, Thanks for share this article.

    College Research Papers

    ReplyDelete
  7. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dboA8cag1M&feature=player_embedded#!

    http://fortyplustwo.com/

    I admire your post visit the link above for more info..

    knowledge center

    ReplyDelete
  8. It is incomprehensible to me now, but in general, the usefulness and significance is overwhelming. Thanks again and good luck!

    ReplyDelete
  9. the first pictures were very funny, and getting into the topic qu ero body language that is widely used in the world, some people do not even realize they are using body language .. this is a very interesting topic!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I get why you might want to debunk the misquote of this study but I wonder what you view is on the results of Professor Mehrabian’s actual studies "Decoding of Inconsistent Communications" and "Inference of Attitudes from Nonverbal Communication in Two Channels" along with subsequent studies of the comparative effect of non-verbal and verbal cues on theory of mind, meaning, feeling and intention. We can all keep going back to rant about the constant misquote–which will frankly never cease because it is simple and entertaining, or now move forward and think carefully about what might be useful about understanding the relative merits of words, images and tones in communicating intention, feeling and data. Certainly with a number of my clients in marketing and public relations we have some very hard, real-time data on all of this, that in no way negates words as extremely effective at communicating and influencing, yet when combined with the right movement, behavior, physical imagery and tonality the results we are looking for from receivers increase in such a way that you would ignore them at just too great a cost.

    Merahbian is taken out of context and that is not too helpful—but it does sell an idea, just as you, Max could be viewed as taking Shakespeare out of context to sell yours. (I do hope you did not cherry-pick like that when working with politicians–I’d feel horribly manipulated ;-) Shakespeare like Mehrabian is a little more complex than a single line can communicate I think. In context we might find that Mark Anthony is using the words “lend me your ears” to appeal to his audience to be rational rather than emotional. However, around it he contrives to win their trust and pull them into a rage. It is more complex, duplicitous and poetic on both a dramatic and meta level than a simple instruction to listen to some words.

    I am no orator as you are Max, but maybe its time to put down the dagger on body language and look at it more carefully?

    Mark Bowden
    www.truthplane.com

    Full disclosure–I’ve written a current bestseller on “body language” so obviously I am, both consciously and unconsciously, totally, totally biased.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I get why you might want to debunk the misquote of this study but I wonder what you view is on the results of Professor Mehrabian’s actual studies "Decoding of Inconsistent Communications" and "Inference of Attitudes from Nonverbal Communication in Two Channels" along with subsequent studies of the comparative effect of non-verbal and verbal cues on theory of mind, meaning, feeling and intention. We can all keep going back to rant about the constant misquote–which will frankly never cease because it is simple and entertaining, or we can move forward and think carefully about what might be useful about understanding the relative merits of words, images and tones in communicating intention, feeling and data. Certainly with a number of my clients in marketing and public relations we have some very hard, real-time data on all of this, that in no way negates words as extremely effective at communicating and influencing, yet when combined with the right movement, behavior, physical imagery and tonality the results we are looking for from receivers increase in such a way that you would ignore them at just too great a cost.

    Merahbian is taken out of context and that is not too helpful—but it does sell an idea, just as you take Shakespeare out of context to sell yours. (I do hope you did not cherry-pick like that when working with politicians–I’d feel horribly manipulated.) Shakespeare like Mehrabian is a little more complex than a single line can communicate I think. In context we might find that Mark Anthony is using the words “lend me your ears” to appeal to his audience to be rational rather than emotional. However, around it he contrives to win their trust and pull them into a rage. It is more complex, duplicitous and poetic on both a dramatic and meta level than a simple instruction to listen to some words.
    I am no orator as you are Max, but maybe its time to put down the dagger on body language and look at it more carefully?

    Mark Bowden
    www.truthplane.com

    Full disclosure–I’ve written a current bestseller on “body language” so obviously I am, both consciously and unconsciously, totally, totally biased.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I get why you might want to debunk the misquote of this study but I wonder what you view is on the results of Professor Mehrabian’s actual studies "Decoding of Inconsistent Communications" and "Inference of Attitudes from Nonverbal Communication in Two Channels" along with subsequent studies of the comparative effect of non-verbal and verbal cues on theory of mind, meaning, feeling and intention. We can all keep going back to rant about the constant misquote–which will frankly never cease because it is simple and entertaining, or we can move forward and think carefully about what might be useful about understanding the relative merits of words, images and tones in communicating intention, feeling and data. Certainly with a number of my clients in marketing and public relations we have some very hard, real-time data on all of this, that in no way negates words as extremely effective at communicating and influencing, yet when combined with the right movement, behavior, physical imagery and tonality the results we are looking for from receivers increase in such a way that you would ignore them at just too great a cost.

    Merahbian is taken out of context and that is not too helpful—but it does sell an idea, just as you take Shakespeare out of context to sell yours. (I do hope you did not cherry-pick like that when working with politicians–I’d feel horribly manipulated.) Shakespeare like Mehrabian is a little more complex than a single line can communicate I think. In context we might find that Mark Anthony is using the words “lend me your ears” to appeal to his audience to be rational rather than emotional. However, around it he contrives to win their trust and pull them into a rage. It is more complex, duplicitous and poetic on both a dramatic and meta level than a simple instruction to listen to some words.
    I am no orator as you are Max, but maybe its time to put down the dagger on body language and look at it more carefully?

    Mark Bowden
    www.truthplane.com

    Full disclosure–I’ve written a current bestseller on “body language” so obviously I am, both consciously and unconsciously, totally, totally biased.

    ReplyDelete
  13. One of the most widely repeated myths asserts that the relative importance of different factors in communication is even more extreme than the 80% referred to in the above cartoon...

    ReplyDelete
  14. Finally someone has exposed the myth. Max you did a splendid job. Mehrabian's research was based on the utterance of a single word in which the human lab rats would deliver the word with different intents. Even Dr. Mehrabian has criticized the ninety three percent model. He claims the intent of the study was to monitor feelings and attitudes not channels of communication. Bravo!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Here we can get some great tutorial for "Body language and non-verbal communication" Illustrator explaining how to use the Free Transform, Shear, Skew and Reflect tools to create vector logo types and icons in perspective.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I think that the Body language and non-verbal communication, does been used a lot but I think such things are really those which has to be called as important to get know about.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The Body language and non-verbal communication is some thing nice to get know about because the body language is a thing which tells the personality of the person and I think this is good of things to get know about.

    ReplyDelete
  18. The world grows smaller all the time as more communication channels open up and more words are written. However, the basics of communication are still focused on the aim of making one’s message understood by another person or group of people.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Body language tells everything. Nice cartune. Good job.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This is very good information on body language. The comic is very nice. Good job.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Actually in some other languages body language and facial expression is more important than English. Somehow I beleive that meaning of the words does not change as much in English depending on the tone of the voice or face expression. In some languages hand gestures plays quite an important role as well. Still English is the plainest of the languages and we are probably lucky to express oursleves in words and do not have to put our face into hundred different shapes everyday just to communicate.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Valuable information and excellent design you got here!


    http://www.boundlesstech.net

    ReplyDelete
  23. That is very good comment you shared.Thank you so much that for you shared those things with us.Im wishing you to carry on with ur achivments.All the best. |chat | chat sohbet| muhabbet

    ReplyDelete
  24. Thank you for sharing to us.there are many person searching about that now they will find enough resources by your post.I would like to join your blog anyway so please continue sharing with us

    ReplyDelete
  25. It is nice to find a site about my interest. My first visit to your site is been a big help. Thank you for the efforts you been putting on making your site such an interesting and informative place to browse through. I'll be visiting your site again to gather some more valuable information. You truly did a good job.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Yemek Tarifleri Thanks for this post – I have struggled with this as I have NO comments yet on my blog and in some ways feel badly about that (until i read your posts about this) and yet I see there is more that I can do. thankss.

    ReplyDelete
  27. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  28. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  29. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  30. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  31. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  32. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  33. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  34. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  35. your blog is looking so nice & informative..
    Thanks for this all info...

    Jobs Recruitment Consultant in Gurgaon

    Jobs in Delhi-NCR

    ReplyDelete
  36. In the modern world communication plays a vital role in every filed especially in the business organizations.Thanks for this useful post here with us great work keep it up...

    ReplyDelete
  37. That's really massive exposure post and I must admire you in this regard.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Excellent site, keep up the good work my colleagues would love this.

    ReplyDelete
  39. hi....very nice post. I am surely grateful to you for providing us with this priceless info. My spouse are truthfully grateful, precisely the information we needed.admin keep posting such an interesting posts thanks for sharing this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  40. this post really very good and effective for me thanks for sharing this nice post.

    ReplyDelete
  41. oh my word, that is just adorable!I would like to congratulate the writer and encouraged him to continue writing such valuable materials. I would like to send greetings to all readers. Thank you for your information.

    ReplyDelete
  42. I really like your post. always been very informational.

    ReplyDelete
  43. A very nice page. I think the effort has passed, we have to thank you:))
    Dis estetiği

    ReplyDelete
  44. Some interesting stuff here. Thanks for the share!!!

    ReplyDelete
  45. The post is written in very a good manner and it entails many useful information for me. I am happy to find your distinguished way of writing the post. Now you make it easy for me to understand and implement the concept. Thank you for the post.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Very good post, very useful informations.

    ReplyDelete
  47. I really enjoy reading your blog. This post, even if old, was really useful.

    Logo Design

    ReplyDelete
  48. Thanks for sharing such a wonderful and interesting opinion.

    Contextual Intelligence

    ReplyDelete
  49. You got a really useful blog I have been here reading for about an hour. I am a newbie and your success is very much an inspiration for me.

    Relationship Issues

    ReplyDelete
  50. Thanks for your marvelous posting! I enjoyed reading it. I really feel as though I know so much more about this than I did before. Your blog really brought some things to light that I never would have thought about before reading it. You should continue this, Im sure most people would agree youve got a gift.
    Show Plates

    ReplyDelete
  51. Totally love how this came out--looks like something from an editorial. Love the feather earrings.
    cam balkon
    alüminyum
    düğün salonu
    çankırı

    ReplyDelete
  52. Almanya chat Nice share thank you Almanya Chat

    ReplyDelete
  53. Make your sentences clear and easy to understand and this issue does not arise.

    cialis

    küpeşte

    sineklik

    ReplyDelete
  54. The post is written in very a good manner and it entails many useful information for me. I appreciated what you have done here. I am always searching for informative information like this. Thanks for sharing with us.
    Prank Calls

    ReplyDelete
  55. Mehrabian's information was based on his own research which doesn't really apply to everyday communication.

    For anyone who would like to know more about Mehrabian, please read this article by Olivia Mitchell. It dispels a lot of myths about Mehrabian's ideas and will give you a fantastic explanation about why Mehrabian's ideas aren't relevant to everyday conversation...

    http://www.speakingaboutpresenting.com/presentation-myths/mehrabian-nonverbal-communication-research/

    ReplyDelete
  56. Very informative and trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one.
    cinsel sohbet
    I have booked marked your site and am about to email it to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading
    çet sohbet
    Thanks for your explanation was very good effort, while health information in your hand
    sohbetci

    They look very nice, wonderful =)

    sohbet net -
    yazgülü sohbet -
    seviyeli sohbet -
    adana sohbet -
    kerizim -
    çet sohbet -
    yazgülü -
    sohbet et -
    yonja -
    cinsel chat

    ReplyDelete
  57. Very informative and trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one.
    cinsel sohbet
    I have booked marked your site and am about to email it to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading
    çet sohbet
    Thanks for your explanation was very good effort, while health information in your hand
    sohbetci

    They look very nice, wonderful =)

    sohbet net -
    yazgülü sohbet -
    seviyeli sohbet -
    adana sohbet -
    kerizim -
    çet sohbet -
    yazgülü -
    sohbet et -
    yonja -
    cinsel chat

    ReplyDelete
  58. En Güzel SohbetLer Burda YapıLır.

    ReplyDelete
  59. its really very great and informative post. thanks for sharing the information.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Thank you, I have recently been searching for information about this topic for a while and yours is the best I've found out so far. But, what concerning the conclusion? Are you positive in regards to the source?
    harga cmp klorofil

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.